State of Ministry · Findings

15 things
the data says

Short findings, one comparison each. Every claim here was tested twice — once raw, then again inside strata of church size and volunteer status, because those two things drive most answers in this survey at once. Only the ones that survived are on this page.

06
Volunteers

The Training Gap

Three in ten ministries never train their volunteers. Those leaders report more exhaustion, more discouragement, and more doubt about their own faith.

+6.8% mental or emotional exhaustion · no regular training vs trains volunteers
07
Teaching

Deciding Alone

Three in ten leaders choose what gets taught with no other voice in the process. It is the single strongest signal of strain in this entire survey.

+10.7% burnout · decides teaching alone vs has input
08
Annual planning

No Plan At All

One in five ministries has no planning process of any kind. Against those who run a real annual session, the exhaustion gap is eight points.

+7.7% mental or emotional exhaustion · no process vs annual session
09
Families

Parents In The Room

Only 16% of leaders let parents shape what gets taught. Where they do, reported parent engagement is twelve points higher — the largest positive gap we measured.

+11.7% parents engaged with the ministry · parents have input vs they don't
10
Annual planning

Students At The Table

One in five ministries includes the kids in annual planning. Those ministries report better parent engagement too — the effect carries past the students themselves.

+9.3% parents engaged with the ministry · students in the room vs adults only
11
Annual planning

Cover From Above

When senior leadership sits in on ministry planning, the ministry leader reports less burnout. It is the clearest protective factor in the survey.

−5.7% burnout · senior leaders present vs absent
12
Ideas

What Worked Before

One in five leaders looks nowhere for new ideas. They are markedly more likely to feel pressure to grow the numbers.

+7.6% pressure to grow numbers · sticks with what worked vs looks outside
13
Events

Nothing New This Year

Eighteen percent of leaders tried nothing new in twelve months. Burnout among them runs ten points higher than among monthly experimenters.

+8.7% burnout · nothing new vs something new monthly
14
Families

Radio Silence

Eight percent of ministries have no regular way of talking to families. Their leaders report the highest exhaustion gap in the survey — eleven points.

+10.7% mental or emotional exhaustion · no regular contact vs communicates
15
Annual planning

Too Busy To Plan

Twenty-seven percent name being too busy as their biggest planning obstacle. They are the leaders most likely to feel under-resourced.

+5.6% feeling under-resourced · too busy to plan vs other obstacles
16
Ideas

The Podcast Effect

Leaders who listen to ministry podcasts report less exhaustion, fewer resource complaints, and are meaningfully more likely to say they're doing okay.

+5.4% i've been doing okay · listens to podcasts vs doesn't
17
Volunteers

The Handwritten Note

The cheapest volunteer appreciation tactic in the survey tracks with a five-point drop in the leader's own discouragement.

−5.0% feeling discouraged · writes notes vs doesn't
18
Volunteers

Cadence Beats Calendar

Training volunteers monthly rather than annually is associated with a leader who is five points more likely to say they're doing fine.

+5.5% i've been doing okay · trains monthly or more vs trains annually
19
Events

More Events, Less Exhaustion

The ministries running five or more major events a year report less exhaustion than those running two or fewer. This is the opposite of what we expected.

−5.8% mental or emotional exhaustion · 5+ events a year vs 2 or fewer
20
Teaching

Week To Week

A third of leaders plan teaching a week at a time or not at all. The thing that tracks with it isn't exhaustion — it's doubt about their own faith.

+4.5% experiencing doubt or questions in my own faith · week to week vs planned ahead
What didn't survive

Findings we went looking for and had to drop

These looked real in raw form. Each one collapsed once church size and volunteer status were held constant, or never cleared significance at all. They are published because a reader who can see what failed has reason to trust what passed.

Rural churches pay less
raw −$9,928 vs suburban and urban adjusted −$1,573 (z = −1.1)

Rural churches are smaller. Church size drives pay; the rural label adds nothing once size is held constant.

Lead pastors earn less than kids and youth staff
raw −$5,503 adjusted +$1,281 (z = +0.8)

Lead pastors in this sample are concentrated in small churches. Within any size band the difference disappears and mildly reverses.

Part-time leaders are paid disproportionately little
raw −$3,833 in the 100–250 band adjusted −$1,079 (z = −0.8)

Part-time roles cluster in small churches. Their pay tracks the church, not the arrangement. The real part-time story is workload, not salary — see Half the Hours.

A gender pay gap among paid leaders
raw +$1,470 toward women adjusted 1.1 standard errors — indistinguishable from zero

No salary gap anywhere in this data clears its own margin of error, at national, regional or state level. The gap in who gets paid at all clears it by 5.4×. See Who Gets Paid.

Ministries without a shared definition of discipleship struggle more
raw nothing reached significance adjusted —

17% say they have no shared definition. It predicted none of the nine strain outcomes. A real result, and not the one we assumed.

Using AI tools separates leaders in some way
raw nothing reached significance adjusted —

38% use ChatGPT or similar for ideas. On every outcome tested they are indistinguishable from everyone else.

Never hosting parent touchpoints predicts strain
raw +6.1 under-resourced, +5.9 burnout adjusted z = +1.3 and +1.6 — both fail

Smaller ministries host fewer parent events and report more strain for unrelated reasons. Adjustment removes the association.

Repeating last year's events predicts stagnation
raw +5.5 on 'tried nothing new' adjusted z = +1.8 — just fails

Close, but under our threshold. Reported here rather than rounded up into a story.

Leaders who give parents input also host more parent events
raw −2.5 points on hosting monthly adjusted z = −1.7 — fails, and points the wrong way

We assumed influence and activity would travel together. They don't: these leaders host parent touchpoints no more often than anyone else. Giving parents a say is not the same as putting on more events, and only the former tracks with engagement.

How a finding earns a page

A claim ships only if the difference keeps its direction and clears two standard errors after pooling within strata of church size (q2) x volunteer status (q1). Groups smaller than 30 are never compared, and a stratum contributes only when both arms hold at least 25 respondents.

This matters because church size, tenure and paid status jointly drive a general tendency toward more structured ministry. Without adjustment, almost any two good practices appear to cause each other. Every number on these pages is generated from the dataset at build time and independently re-derived by a verification script.